The judge granted the license to build in the 'Villa of the diocese' by Lloreda
The Contentious Administrative Court No. 2 has estimated the resource Santander brought against the City of Alfoz of Lloredo by urbanization the "Villa of the diocese" in Cóbreces, and stated that the developer has obtained a license applicant works "administrative silence" of the Consistory.
In a statement to which you have accessed the agency Efe, the owner of the Court argued that there was a "positive silence" by the City because the City Administration has not established that the proposed leases Castilla "suffered from essential services serious and notorious, "as was claimed. Saturday, January 29, 2011
When Was Waxing Invented
also void the decision of November 5, 2007 issued by the City Council for refusing the license, considering it "untimely" and "unlawful" because it does not followed the official review channels provided by law.
The dispute between the company and the city has its origins in 2004 when the developer acquired the "Villa of the diocese" in Cóbreces to build 40 social housing there. Some time later, a new company acquired the property to build 80 homes free price and that was the source of disagreements with the City.
Years later, the current government promoted the amendment of subsidiary legislation for the construction of public housing. In April 2009, the court decided to charge Torrelavega Alfoz Mayor of Lloredo, Enrique Breton, and five aldermen, having voted for an amendment to the subsidiary rules of the municipality that was intended to allocate the "Villa of the diocese" to the construction of public housing (VPO).
But a year later, the case opened for trespass against the six aldermen was filed with the Court of Cantabria, not to find "manifest injustice" or "misuse of power 'as claimed by the investigating judge, the prosecution and the owner of the farm where it was built.
Published in:
www.eldiariomontañes.es
But a year later, the case opened for trespass against the six aldermen was filed with the Court of Cantabria, not to find "manifest injustice" or "misuse of power 'as claimed by the investigating judge, the prosecution and the owner of the farm where it was built.
Published in:
www.eldiariomontañes.es
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment